Acme and lower South Fork landowners, we want to hear from you! Please fill out this brief online poll to share your individual experiences with flooding. We want to incorporate these recent experiences and observations into our hydraulic modeling and use them to better understand and incorporate community needs into the design process.
The South Fork Nooksack (Nuxw7íyem)1 River Fish Camp (Ts’éq)2 Integrated Flood and Fish Project (Fish Camp Project) is a collaboration of the Nooksack Indian Tribe Natural Resources Department (Tribe) and the Whatcom County Public Works River and Flood Division to develop broadly-supported, multi-beneficial solutions to reduce flood risk to the Acme community and restore habitat for ESA-listed early-timed Chinook salmon and other salmonid species. Community and stakeholder involvement is both a major component of this project and key to its success. Community meetings and close coordination with affected landowners will occur throughout the project to convey technical information and solicit feedback.
Local residents provide their input at Community Workshop #1 on June 27th at the Acme Presbyterian Church
A citizen weighs whether or not to cross floodwaters rushing across SR 9 north of the Acme General Store. Credit: Whatcom County River and Flood
Adult chinook holding in an engineered log jam (ELJ) at the Hardscrabble Restoration Project Reach in the South Fork Nooksack River. ELJ’s and natural log jams create scour pools with complex cover, often with cooler temperatures, that are a refuge for adult holding and juvenile rearing. Credit: Nooksack Natural Resources
Local South Fork Nooksack Valley resident discussing recent erosion concerns to Nooksack Tribe Natural Resources Staff in 2017. Credit: Nooksack Natural Resources (Lindsie Fratus-Thomas)
“It’s in our hands”, juvenile salmonid captured during fish exclusion during ELJ construction on the Nooksack River. Credit: Nooksack Natural Resources (Lindsie Fratus-Thomas)
South Fork County Park. Credit: Whatcom County Parks and Recreation
Fly fisherman fishing on the South Fork Nooksack near Van Zandt 2009. Credit: Bellingham Herald
State Route Highway 9 floods regularly in the fall/winter during high flows in the Acme Valley. Credit: KGMI/Jake Hazel
Farmland in the South Fork Nooksack Valley. Credit: South Fork Nooksack River Watershed Community Watershed Project (Holly O’Neil)
Female Chinook salmon from the South Fork Nooksack River that died prior to spawning (known as pre-spawn mortality). Flavobacterium columnare (Columnaris) is a pathogen associated with high temperatures that has been confirmed as a cause for pre-spawn mortalities of salmon in the South Fork Nooksack River. Credit: Nooksack Natural Resources (Joe Rodriguez)
Flooding in the South Fork Valley 11/13/2015. Credit: Nooksack Natural Resources (Lindsie Fratus-Thomas)
The Fish Camp Project Area is located in the lower South Fork Nooksack River (SFNR) valley downstream and upstream of the town of Acme between river mile (RM) 7.3 and RM 9.7, respectively. The Project Area includes the SFNR mainstem channel and floodplain habitats and extends from the end of Rothenbuhler Rd. in the south to just downstream of the BNSF railway bridge in the north. The State Route (SR) 9 bridge crosses over the SFNR near RM 8.6 and conveniently separates the project area into upstream and downstream sections.
Problems this project will address include negative impacts from flooding in the Acme community and degraded habitat that strongly limits abundance and productivity of wild Nooksack early-timed Chinook salmon.
The Project Area presents a unique opportunity to develop an integrated flood-fish project that builds partnerships and addresses community needs, and can serve as a pilot for broader integration of salmon recovery and floodplain management throughout the Nooksack River basin.
Community outreach and the preliminary design process started with the first community workshop in 2019, and input from workshop participants helped the design team frame initial project concepts that both reduced flood risk and improved habitat conditions. Those initial concepts can be found here.
Using the concepts as a foundation, the project team went through an extensive process of (hydraulic) modeling individual design elements and then combined numerous elements into three separate design options. The project team modeled these three design options to analyze the river’s response to the combined effects of an array of design elements. The project team used the modeling results from the three options to develop draft design alternatives that showed the greatest combined benefits for flood risk reduction and salmon habitat improvements. The design alternatives were presented at the second community workshop in January 2020, and feedback from the workshop helped inform the alternatives evaluation criteria. Each alternative was evaluated and scored based on multiple criterion for each of the project performance categories listed below.
A preliminary design for the project was developed based on the highest ranked alternative. Elements in the preliminary design include:
Preliminary design for the highest ranked alternative was presented at the most recent (third) community workshop on September 15th, 2022. A summary of the workshop and community feedback received can be found in the Outreach & Engagement section below. Overall, feedback has been positive, and the community is eager to support solutions to reduce flood risk and improve habitat. This graphic depicts the steps in the design process to date. The Preliminary Design Report provides a detailed overview of the design development, alternatives analysis, the highest rank alternative, and the preliminary design.
To accommodate funding availability, landowner outreach needs, and factors related to implementation (permitting, constructability, etc.), the project team has separated the project into two areas: Project Area 1 and Project Area 2. Project Area 1 is downstream of the SR-9 bridge and extends to the downstream extent of the riprap revetment along the left bank (looking downstream) on the Acme Farms property. Project Area 2 is upstream of (and includes) the SR-9 bridge and extends south to Rothenbuhler Rd. Refinement of design, hydraulic modeling, and stakeholder outreach for Project Areas 1 and 2 will occur simultaneously with an emphasis on developing Project Area 1 designs at a somewhat faster pace. The anticipated timeline for design refinement is provided below and will be updated as progress is made.
The project team will reach out directly to stakeholders associated with the project for review and input throughout these design stages (30%, 60%, etc.). Project updates will be sent to the Fish Camp project listserv and posted on this page.
The project co-leads are committed to engaging stakeholders throughout this process. The team has hosted three community workshops to solicit feedback from the community and to provide updates on the design process so far. The team will continue to hold meetings with individuals and groups to discuss ideas and concerns as designs are further developed.
The project team sends regular updates via a Listserv, and they are also posted below:
Workshop #3 September 15, 2022
Workshop #2 January 26, 2021
Workshop #1 June 27, 2019
1. Nuxw7íyem: This is the name for the South Fork Nooksack River in the Lhéchelesem, Nooksack language. The word translates to “always clear water” because this fork of the Nooksack River is non-glacial and is clear much of the year (Richardson, 2011).
2. Ts’éq: This is the name for the Creek and Fish Camp at Acme in the Lhéchelesem, Nooksack language. The word translates to “fermented salmon eggs” since there was a fish camp at this location, its likely salmon eggs were fermented at the camp. The stretch of river near Acme was fished for spring chinook from natural log jams with spears and dip nets (Richardson, 2011).
Citation: Richardson, Allan, and Brent Galloway. Nooksack Place Names: Geography, culture and language. UBC Press, 2011.
More Nooksack words can be found here: https://nooksacktribe.org/word